J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21; 93(Suppl 3): 66–71.

Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Context of Different Levels of Data*

Ola Rolfson, MD, PhD, 1 Alastair Rothwell, ChM, FRACS, 2 Art Sedrakyan, MD, PhD, 3 Kate Eresian Chenok, MBA, 4 Eric Bohm, BEng, MD, MSc, FRCSC, 5 Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA, 6 and Göran Garellick, MD, PhD 7

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.


Link to article