Thirty-Day Complications of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 103,855 Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has gained popularity in orthopedics for both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the past decades.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent a primary, unilateral THA and TKA from 2011 to 2013. Multivariate analysis was conducted to compare the postoperative complications in patients whose surgery involved the use of CAS with those by conventional techniques.

We identified 103,855 patients who had THA and TKA in the database between 2011 and 2013. There were higher overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; CI, 1.22-1.59), minor events (OR, 1.38; CI, 1.21-1.58), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 1.44; CI, 1.25-1.67) in the conventional group when compared with CAS for TKA. However, rate of reoperation was higher in the CAS group for TKA (OR, 1.60; CI, 1.15-2.25). The results also showed higher overall adverse events (OR, 2.61; CI, 2.09-3.26), minor events (OR, 2.82; CI, 2.24-3.42), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 3.41; CI, 2.62-4.44) in the conventional group when compared to CAS for THA. Nevertheless, superficial wound infections (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.26-0.81) were shown to be higher in the CAS group undergoing THA.

The use of CAS in THA and TKA reduced the number of minor adverse events in the first 30 days postoperatively. However, CAS was associated with an increased number of reoperations and superficial infections. The clinical benefits and disadvantages of CAS should be considered when determining the potential benefit–cost ratio of this technology.