Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy May 2018, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1524–1531

Superior long-term survival for fixed bearing compared with mobile bearing in ligament-balanced total knee arthroplasty

Heesterbeek, P.J.C., van Houten, A.H., Klenk, J.S. et al.
Knee

Purpose

Only few long-term data on ligament-balanced cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR TKA) are currently available. Either a mobile- or fixed-bearing insert can be chosen, which showed good mid-term outcome and few complications and revisions. This multi-centre retrospective cross-sectional cohort study investigated the 12-year results of primary TKA using a balancing gap technique and compared survival and clinical outcome between fixed and mobile inserts.

 

Methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, 557 cases of three clinics (2 Swiss, 1 Dutch) operated between 1998 and 2003 with the first series of a TKA implanted with a balanced gap technique (433 (77.7%) fixed, 124 (22.3%) mobile (anterior–posterior gliding (7–9 mm) and rotational (15°) degrees of freedom) inserts) were included for survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier, by insert type). At the 12-year follow-up (FU) examination of 189 cases, range of motion, knee society score (KSS), numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain and satisfaction were determined and radiographs were evaluated by median tests, by insert type.

 

Results

Of 521 cases available for analysis, 28 (5.4%; 11 fixed, 17 mobile bearing) were revised. Mean cumulative survival after 12.4 years was 97.0% (95% CI 94.7–98.4) for fixed bearings and 85.4% (95% CI 77.5–90.7) after 12.2 years for mobile bearings, p < 0.0001. Patients’ mean age at 11.0 years FU (n = 189) was 78.0 (range 54.5–97.3) years. Mean total KSS was 157.8 (24–200) points, and mean passive flexion was 114° (45–150); no clinical score differed significantly between fixed and mobile bearings.

 

Conclusion

This study showed a superior survival for fixed bearing compared with mobile bearing in a CR TKA using a ligament-balanced technique after more than 12 years. Clinical outcomes are excellent to good after long-term follow-up, and similar for fixed and mobile bearing.

 

Level of evidence

Therapeutic studies—retrospective cohort study, Level III.


Link to article