Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional technique for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective single centre study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the early functional outcomes between robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) and conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 52 patients (26 RATKA and 26 TKA). All procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon using identical approach and implant designs. Post-operative evaluation consisted of the risks of inflammatory and blood loss, the accuracy of mechanical alignment, post-operative pain, peri-operative and post-operative functional outcomes, and complications for 30 days after index surgery.

Results

There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics of patients between two groups (p > 0.05). There was a trend that the operative time of RATKA was prolonged compared with manual TKA (p < 0.0001). However, the risks of infection and blood loss did not increase accordingly (p > 0.05). No statistical difference was found in the correction of mechanical alignment between two groups (p > 0.05). The RATKA was associated with reduced pain post-operatively in day 1 (p < 0.05). Afterwards, there was no systematic difference in VAS score from day two to three post-operatively (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in functional recovery (p > 0.05). No complication occurred in both groups.

Conclusion

Although the operative time was prolonged in RATKA, it did not increase the risks of infection and blood loss. There was no significant difference in radiological or functional outcomes between RATKA and conventional manual TKA. RATKA might be related to reduced pain after surgery.