The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient, operative, implant, surgeon, and hospital factors associated with aseptic revision after primary THA in patients registered in a large US Total Joint Replacement Registry. A total of 35,960 THAs registered from 4/2001–12/2010 were evaluated. The 8-year survival rate was 96.7% (95% CI 96.4%–97.0%). Females had a higher risk of aseptic revision than males. Hispanic and Asian patients had a lower risk of revision than white patients. Ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene, and metal-on-conventional polyethylene bearing surfaces had a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene. Body mass index, health status, diabetes, diagnosis, fixation, approach, bilateral procedures, head size, surgeon fellowship training, surgeon and hospital volume were not revision risk factors.
CoxaPro
> Clinical Library > Welcome to the joint replacement clinical library > Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
The Journal of Arthroplasty, Volume 29, Issue 7, 1412 - 1417
Hip
Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
Khatod, Monti et al.Hip