The Journal of Arthroplasty, COMPLICATIONS - INFECTION | VOLUME 37, ISSUE 1, P132-141, JANUARY 01, 2022

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prediction via Machine Learning: Comprehensible Personalized Decision Support for Diagnosis

Feng-Chih Kuo, MD Wei-Huan Hu, MS Yuh-Jyh Hu, PhD

Ankle Elbow Hip Knee Shoulder Wrist

Highlights

•
Developed an ensemble meta-learning system for PJI diagnosis.
•
Designed an explanation generator to provide comprehensible interpretations of the machine learning (ML) predictions as personalized decision support for PJI diagnosis.
•
Cross-validation demonstrated ML’s superior predictive performance to that of the scoring criteria outlined in the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring system for various metrics.
•
The adaptive ML models can serve as an auxiliary system to the ICM scoring criteria for diagnosing PJI.

Abstract

Background

The criteria outlined in the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) in 2018, which were prespecified and fixed, have been commonly practiced by clinicians to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We developed a machine learning (ML) system for PJI diagnosis and compared it with the ICM scoring system to verify the feasibility of ML.

Methods

We designed an ensemble meta-learner, which combined 5 learning algorithms to achieve superior performance by optimizing their synergy. To increase the comprehensibility of ML, we developed an explanation generator that produces understandable explanations of individual predictions. We performed stratified 5-fold cross-validation on a cohort of 323 patients to compare the ML meta-learner with the ICM scoring system.

Results

Cross-validation demonstrated ML’s superior predictive performance to that of the ICM scoring system for various metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Moreover, the case study showed that ML was capable of identifying personalized important features missing from ICM and providing interpretable decision support for individual diagnosis.

Conclusion

Unlike ICM, ML could construct adaptive diagnostic models from the available patient data instead of making diagnoses based on prespecified criteria. The experimental results suggest that ML is feasible and competitive for PJI diagnosis compared with the current widely used ICM scoring criteria. The adaptive ML models can serve as an auxiliary system to ICM for diagnosing PJI.

Link to article