Mediolateral coronal laxity does not correlate with knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty

Introduction

It remains controversial whether coronal laxity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a critical factor in determining clinical outcomes such as knee range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between postoperative ROM and coronal laxity, which was defined as the angular motion from the neutral, unloaded position to the loaded position, in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA.

Materials and methods

Preoperative and 1-year postoperative coronal laxity were assessed using radiographs by applying a force of 150 N with an arthrometer. A consecutive series of 204 knees was examined. A knee was defined as clinically “balanced” when the difference between medial and lateral laxity was 3° or less. Active ROM was measured using a goniometer. Values were expressed as median values.

Results

The ROM was 105° preoperatively and 110° postoperatively, with the correlation being weak (r = 0.372, p < 0.001) between the periods. The total laxity also revealed a weak correlation (r = 0.270, p < 0.001) between the periods. Preoperative laxity was significantly larger (4° vs. 3°) on the medial side (p < 0.001) and postoperative laxity was larger (4° vs. 3°) laterally (p = 0.001). There was no significant correlation between postoperative ROM and laxity pre- and postoperatively. Additionally, there were no differences in ROM between the balanced and unbalanced groups in the pre- and postoperative periods.

Conclusions

This study indicated that mediolateral coronal laxity in patients with an osteoarthritic knee did not correlate with knee ROM after TKA when 3°–4° of laxity in the medial and lateral orientations was maintained.