Is there an increased stem migration or compromised osteointegration of the Mayo™ short-stemmed prosthesis following cerclage wiring of an intrasurgical periprosthetic fracture?

Aim

Short-stemmed prostheses are increasingly regarded as implants of first choice in primary THA. As a result of the press-fit fixation in the femoral metaphysis, the occurrence of intraoperative fractures were reported. The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative results of the Mayo™ short-stem prosthesis following treatment of an intrasurgical femur fracture with cerclage wiring.

Patients and methods

From 1999 to 2005, in 38 patients (18 females, 20 males; mean age 56 years; mean BMI = 27) with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis in whom a Mayo™ short-stemmed prosthesis has been implanted, an intraoperative fracture was observed. The fractures were treated with cerclage wiring (1 cerclage, n = 32; 2 cerclages, n = 5; 3 cerclages, n = 1). Postoperatively, all patients were prescribed mobilization without weight-bearing (floor contact) on the treated leg for 6 weeks. Using the Wristing^© software, longitudinal stem migration and varus–valgus femoral stem alignment were examined digitally in anteroposterior X-rays taken immediately after surgery, after 6 weeks and on average after 5.7 years (Zeh et al., Z Orthop Unfall 149:200–205, 2011). Additionally, the incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines was captured in the anteroposterior X-rays and assigned to the Gruen zones. Additionally, a DEXA scan was performed. The X-rays of a matched control group after the implantation of a Mayo™ prosthesis without femur fracture were analyzed by the same method.

Results

There was no significant migration of the Mayo™ prosthesis in the study or control groups during postoperative follow-up (t test, P > 0.05). The cerclage group compared with the control group showed a statistically significant valgus tilt of 1.5° on average during the follow-up, which is regarded to be clinically not relevant. The frequency of occurrence of radiolucent lines was not statistically different (chi-square test, χ = 0.42, P = 0.51). DEXA scans showed no differences of the bone mineral density in the Gruen zones compared with a historical control group.

Conclusion

After wiring of an intrasurgical fracture, no disadvantage could be proven for Mayo™ prosthesis regarding stem migration and varus–valgus alignment. Furthermore, due to the absence of differences in the occurrence of radiolucent lines and the same results in the DEXA scan, an unimpaired osseointegration is assumed.