Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®: May 2007 - Volume 458 - Issue - p 111-116 doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180316caa

Cement Restrictor Function Below the Femoral Isthmus

Moran, Matthew, MSc, MRCS*; Heisel, Christian, MD†; Rupp, Rudi, PhD†; Simpson, A. Hamish R W, MD, FRCS*; Breusch, Steffen J, MD, PhD, FRCS (Ed)
Hip

Cement restrictors rely on achieving an interference fit with the wall of the medullary canal. Depending on the design of the cement restrictor, the intramedullary fit may be compromised as the femur starts to widen distally. Three different designs of cement restrictor were identified; universal, press-fit, and expandable. We determined which design of cement restrictor could resist the greatest pressures in a closed column of cement. Additionally, we recorded leakage of cement past the restrictor. We reamed synthetic femora to recreate the normal distal flare of the femur below the femoral isthmus. After inserting the cement restrictor, low-viscosity cement was gradually pressurized using an electronically controlled pneumatic ram. We then simultaneously recorded cement pressure above the cement restrictor and displacement of the cement restrictor. There was variation in the performance of the cement restrictors. The expandable cement restrictors resisted the greatest pressures. The resorbable expandable (REX Cement Stop) and press-fit cement restrictors reliably prevented cement leakage. The press-fit and universal restrictors failed at low pressures when deployed below the isthmus. The choice of cement restrictor may need to be modified if preoperative templating indicates the restrictor will sit below the femoral isthmus.


Link to article