A Comparison of Stemmed and Unstemmed Components in Revision Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of the current study was to compare retrospectively the results of the Insall-Burstein constrained condylar knee implant used with and without intramedullary stems in 207 revision knee arthroplasties with the Insall-Burstein constrained condylar knee implant. One hundred sixty-one knees had either one or two stems placed. One hundred eight femoral stems and 76 tibial stems were placed. Fifty-five knees had no femoral or tibial stem. The average knee scores ranged from 52 preoperatively to 86 postoperatively. The average range of motion postoperatively was 4° (range, 0°–10°) to 106° (range, 94°–118°) in this group. The average postoperative knee score was 86 in the unstemmed group and 85 in the stemmed group with no difference in average range of motion. There were four (3%) cases of tibial loosening and two (2%) cases of femoral loosening in the unstemmed group. There were two (2%) cases of tibial loosening and two (2%) cases of femoral loosening at an average followup of 4.2 years (range, 2–6.2 years). Despite the higher constraint inherently designed in an Insall-Burstein constrained condylar knee component, the current study did not show a significantly higher loosening in implants without stems compared with implants used with stems. Therefore, the use of a semiconstrained component does not alone constitute a requirement for the use of an intramedullary stem.