Pseudotumor in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a comparison study of three grading systems with MRI
C. Smeekes,corresponding author1,2 B. J. M. Schouten,3 M. Nix,4 B. F. Ongkiehong,2 R. Wolterbeek,5 B. C. H. van der Wal,2 and R. G. H. H. Nelissen1Hip
Objective
Pseudotumors, a well-known complication of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA), are well identified on metal artifact-reducing sequences magnetic resonance imaging (MARS-MRI). Several MRI grading systems are described in the orthopedic literature, but their validity is unknown in large clinical studies. Our study was undertaken to describe the classification of pseudotumors in a preselected cohort divided into high- and low-risk patients, using three pseudotumor grading systems applied on MARS-MRI, and to determine the interobserver reliability of the grading systems.
Patients and methods
A retrospective study was performed on 377 consecutive patients (240 MRI scans) treated with an M2a-38 and Taperloc stem combination (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). Patients were divided into a high-risk and a low-risk group based on previous published risk factors. Two observers determined the presence of pseudotumors using three different pseudotumor grading systems for classifying MARS-MRI results.
Results
The prevalence of pseudotumors as determined with MARS-MRI was 59% in our high-risk group, 0% in the low-risk group and 43% in the control group. Serum cobalt values were increased in the high-risk group. The kappa values of the Anderson, Hauptfleisch and Matthies grading system scores were 0.43, 0.44, and 0.49 respectively.
Conclusions
High-risk patients are at a high risk for pseudotumor development. No pseudotumor development was found in low-risk patients. Interobserver reliability scored best with the Matthies system, but all three grading systems showed only a moderate agreement.
Link to article