Predictors of flexion using the rotating concave–convex total knee arthroplasty: preoperative range of motion is not the only determinant
Langlois, J., Charles-Nelson, A., Katsahian, S. et al.Knee
Purpose
The range of motion achieved after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affects many daily activities and overall patients’ satisfaction. This study aims to define the determinants affecting post-operative midterm active flexion according to a specific cruciate-sacrificing prosthesis, the rotating concave–convex (ROCC®) TKA.
Method
Four hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients (584 TKAs) were prospectively followed. After baseline patient demographics and anatomical characteristics, clinical and radiological post-operative assessments were periodically recorded. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was additionally reported for 120 patients. Eligibility for final inclusion was a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Univariate analyses followed by a multivariate model were fitted to determine the independent predictors of midterm active knee flexion.
Results
Thirty-four TKA (5.8 %) were excluded for a secondary surgery before their 50 years, 69 patients died (11.8 %), and 21 (3.6 %) were lost to follow-up. Overall, 460 TKAs were included. The post-operative mean knee flexion angle was measured at 127.7° ± 9.3°. Significant factors affecting final flexion under univariate analyses were the patient height and body mass index, the absence of previous surgery, a depressive state, the preoperative flexion angle, a preoperative flexion contracture, a patellar residual subluxation, the reconstructed patellar height, and the rotation of the femoral component. The multivariate model confirmed the patient’s height, a depression, the preoperative flexion angle, a patellar residual subluxation, and the patellar height as statistically significant determinants.
Conclusion
Aside from the preoperative flexion angle, numerous predictors of flexion, both patient- and procedure-related were identified. Surgeons should take these into account both when adequately informing their patient before surgery and when performing the arthroplasty itself.
Level of evidence
Prognostic, Level II.
Link to article