Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modified Posterior Approach through Quadratus Femoris Flap Osteotomy; Comparison with Conventional Posterior Approach. HIP International, 26(6), 543–549.
Lambers, A. P., Jennings, R., & Bucknill, A. T. (2016).
2016
A Novel Fluoroscopic Approach to Assessing Patient Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Accuracy and the Influence of Body Mass Index. HIP International, 26(6), 550–553.
Gill, K., Whitehouse, S. L., Hubble, M. J. W., & Wilson, M. J. (2016).
2016
Short-Term Results with a Constrained Acetabular Liner in Patients at High Risk of Dislocation after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. HIP International, 26(6), 580–584.
Marx, A., Beier, A., Richter, A., Lohmann, C. H., & Halder, A. M. (2016).
2016
Major Acetabular Defects Treated with the Burch-Schneider Antiprotrusion Cage and Impaction Bone Allograft in a Large Series: A 5- to 7- Year Follow-up Study. HIP International, 26(6), 585–590.
Early Catastrophic Failure of a PINNACLE MARATHON® Polyethylene Acetabular Liner: A Report of a Malpositioned PINNACLE DUOFIX HA® Acetabular Shell Resulting in Point Loading and Accelerated Wear. HIP International, 26(6), e52–e55.
Somers, J. F. A., Dedrye, L., & Goeminne, S. (2017).
2017
Metal Ion Levels in Ceramic-on-Ceramic THR with Cobalt-Chrome Modular Necks: Analysis of Cobalt and Chromium Serum Levels in 23 Healthy Hip Patients. HIP International, 27(1), 21–25.
A Novel Digital Templating Methodology for Arthroplasty: Experience from Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. HIP International, 27(1), 82–86.
Borgwardt, A., Zerahn, B., Fabricius, S. D., Bertelsen, T. H., Daugaard, H., & Ribel-Madsen, S. (2017).
2017
A Randomised, Controlled Clinical Study on Total Hip Arthroplasty Using 4 Different Bearings: Results after 10 Years. HIP International, 27(1), 96–103.
A Case Control Study of Cemented Acetabular Total Hip Arthroplasty Components in Patients Less than 50 with 5-Year Minimum Follow-up. HIP International, 27(2), 122–127.
Anterior Iliopsoas Impingement due to a Malpositioned Acetabular Component - Effective Relief by Surgical Cup Reorientation. HIP International, 27(2), 128–133.
Moroni, A., Miscione, M. T., Orsini, R., Micera, G., Mosca, S., Sinapi, F., … Banfi, G. (2017).
2017
Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre. HIP International, 27(2), 134–139.
Gerhardt, D. M. J. M., Hannink, G., Rijnders, T., & Van Susante, J. L. C. (2017).
2017
Increase in Physical Activity after Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty is Associated with Calcar and Acetabular Bone Mineral Density Changes. HIP International, 27(2), 140–146.
Suarez-Ahedo, C., Gui, C., Martin, T. J., Chandrasekaran, S., Lodhia, P., & Domb, B. G. (2017).
2017
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Results in Smaller Acetabular Cup Size in Relation to the Femoral Head Size: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study. HIP International, 27(2), 147–152.
Natera, L., Valera, M., Gómez, E. M., Ibañez, N., Crusi, X., & Sancho, R. (2017).
2017
Survival of Hydroxy Apatite-Coated Cups: Acetabular Screws Involve a Lower Rate of Revision Surgery due to Aseptic Loosening. HIP International, 27(2), 153–161.