Otsikko Julkaisija Vuosi Info
The role of bone cement for the development of intraoperative hypotension and hypoxia and its impact on mortality in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures Fredrik Olsen, Mathias Hård Af Segerstad, Bengt Nellgård, Erik Houltz & Sven-Erik Ricksten 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 293-298 Open
Postoperative 30-day complications after cemented/hybrid versus cementless total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients > 70 years Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Pelle Baggesgaard Petersen, Christoffer Calov Jørgensen, Søren Overgaard, Henrik Kehlet & Lundbeck Foundation Center for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Collaborating Group 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 286-292 Open
Increased risk for dislocation after introduction of the Continuum cup system: lessons learnt from a cohort of 1,381 THRs after 1-year follow-up Oskari A Pakarinen, Perttu S Neuvonen, Aleksi R P Reito & Antti P Eskelinen 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 279-285 Open
How do EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L compare in a Swedish total hip replacement population? Ted Eneqvist, Szilárd Nemes, Johan Kärrholm, Kristina Burström & Ola Rolfson 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 272-278 Open
Greater early migration of a short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an increased risk of osseointegration failure: 5th-year results from a prospective RSA study with 39 patients, a follow-up study Thilo Floerkemeier, Stefan Budde, Gabriela v. Lewinski, Henning Windhagen, Christof HurSchler & Michael Schwarze 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 266-271 Open
Metal Ion Interpretation in Resurfacing versus Conventional Hip Arthroplasty and in Whole Blood versus Serum. How should we Interpret Metal Ion Data? Smolders JMH, Bisseling P, Hol A, Van Der Straeten C, Schreurs BW, Van Susante JLC. 2011 Metal Ion Interpretation in Resurfacing versus Conventional Hip Arthroplasty and in Whole Blood versus Serum. How should we Interpret Metal Ion Data? HIP International. 2011;21(5):587-595. Open
Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients Cyrus Brodén, Olof Sandberg, Olof Sköldenberg, Hampus Stigbrand, Mari Hänni, Joshua W Giles, Roger Emery, Stergios Lazarinis, Andreas Nyström & Henrik Olivecrona 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 260-265 Open
Femoral Neck Narrowing following Hip Resurfacing using Posterior and Ganz Approaches at Two Years Deans VM, Ho KWK, Prakash U, Parsons N, Griffin DR, Foguet P. 2011 Femoral Neck Narrowing following Hip Resurfacing using Posterior and Ganz Approaches at Two Years. HIP International. 2011;21(5):596-601. Open
2-year results of an RCT of 2 uncemented isoelastic monoblock acetabular components: lower wear rate with vitamin E blended highly cross-linked polyethylene compared to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene Joost H J van Erp, Julie R A Massier, Jelle J Halma, Thom E Snijders & Arthur de Gast 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 254-259 Open
Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up Steffan Tabori-Jensen, Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard, Torben B Hansen & Maiken Stilling 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:3, 246-253 Open
Groin Pain following Hip Resurfacing: A Case-Control Study Mcarthur JR, Costa M, Griffin DR, Krikler SJ, Parsons N, Foguet PR. 2011 Groin Pain following Hip Resurfacing: A Case-Control Study. HIP International. 2011;21(5):602-609. Open
Function and Survival after Revision of Hip Resurfacing Jaiswal A, Gilbert RE, Kumar KHS, Carrothers AD, Kuiper J-H, Richardson JB. 2011 Function and Survival after Revision of Hip Resurfacing. HIP International. 2011;21(5):610-615. Open
In Vivo Response of Bone Defects Filled with Pmma in an Ovine Model Mcmahon S, Hawdon G, Baré J, Yu Y, Bertollo N, Walsh WR. 2011 In Vivo Response of Bone Defects Filled with Pmma in an Ovine Model. HIP International. 2011;21(5):616-622. Open
External iliac artery injury following total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach—a case report Ellen Burlage, Jasper G Gerbers, Bob R H Geelkerken & Wiebe C Verra 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 485-488 Open
12-year survival analysis of 322 Hintegra total ankle arthroplasties from an independent center Mina Jane Zafar, Thomas Kallemose, Mostafa Benyahia, Lars Bo Ebskov & Jeannette Østergaard Penny 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 444-449 Open
Fracture of an Exeter ‘Cement in Cement’ Revision Stem: A Case Report O’Neill GK, Maheshwari R, Willis C, Meek D, Patil S. 2011 Fracture of an Exeter ‘Cement in Cement’ Revision Stem: A Case Report. HIP International. 2011;21(5):627-629. Open
Why are patients still in hospital after fast-track, unilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Christian Bredgaard Jensen, Anders Troelsen, Christian Skovgaard Nielsen, Niels Kristian Stahl Otte, Henrik Husted & Kirill Gromov 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 433-438 Open
Severe Anaphylactic Reaction to Chlorhexidine during Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery. A Case Report Sijbesma T, Röckmann H, Van Der Weegen W. 2011 Severe Anaphylactic Reaction to Chlorhexidine during Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery. A Case Report. HIP International. 2011;21(5):630-632. Open
Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register Iris van Oost, Koen L M Koenraadt, Liza N van Steenbergen, Stefan B T Bolder & Rutger C I van Geenen 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 426-432 Open
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man Hasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge & David W Murray 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 420-425 Open
Increases in the rates of primary and revision knee replacement are reducing: a 15-year registry study across 3 continents Peter L Lewis, Stephen E Graves, Otto Robertsson, Martin Sundberg, Elizabeth W Paxton, Heather A Prentice & Annette W-Dahl 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 414-41 Open
Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials Azegami S, Gurusamy KS, Parker MJ. 2011 Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. HIP International. 2011;21(5):509-517. Open
Mortality and revision rate of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture: an analysis of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) Bouke J Duijnisveld, Koen L M Koenraadt, Liza N van Steenbergen & Stefan B T Bolder 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 408-413 Open
Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures? Georgios Tsikandylakis, Johan N Kärrholm, Geir Hallan, Ove Furnes, Antti Eskelinen, Keijo Mäkelä, Alma B Pedersen, Søren Overgaard & Maziar Mohaddes 2020 Acta Orthopaedica, 91:4, 401-407 Open
Total Hip Arthroplasties in young Patients under 50 Years: Limited Evidence for Current Trends. A Descriptive Literature Review De Kam DCJ, Busch VJJF, Veth RPH, Schreurs BW. 2011 Total Hip Arthroplasties in young Patients under 50 Years: Limited Evidence for Current Trends. A Descriptive Literature Review. HIP International. 2011;21(5):518-525. Open