Comparison between 1-hour and 24-hour drain clamping using diluted epinephrine solution after total knee arthroplasty
Kunio Yamada; Tsukasa Imaizumi; Manji Uemura; Naoya Takada; Yoshio Kim
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 458-462
Open
Head penetration into Hylamer acetabular liner sterilized by gamma irradiation in air and in a nitrogen atmosphere
Ken-ichi Yamauchi; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Seiki Iwasada; Shinji Sakano; Shinji Kitamura; Hideki Warashina; Hisashi Iwata
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 463-470
Open
Primary total knee arthroplasty for supracondylar/condylar femoral fracture in osteoarthritic knees
Nobuyuki Yoshino; Shinro Takai; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Yasushi Ohshima; Yasusuke Hirasawa
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 471-475
Open
Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients
Robertsson, Otto; Dunbar, Michael J.
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 476-482
Open
Rehabilitation after total shoulder arthroplasty
N.Douglas Boardman III; Robert H. Cofield; Keith A. Bengtson; Richard Little; Maureen C. Jones; Charles M. Rowland
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 483-486
Open
The effect of a tibial baseplate undersurface peripheral lip on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty
Christopher J. Vertullo; J. Rod Davey
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 487-492
Open
Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees
Nobuyuki Yoshino; Shinro Takai; Yasuo Ohtsuki; Yasusuke Hirasawa
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 493-497
Open
Aspergillus fumigatus infection in a mega prosthetic total knee arthroplasty: Salvage by staged reimplantation with 5-year follow-up
Patricia A. Baumann; Benjamin Cunningham; Nishitkumar S. Patel; Henry A. Finn
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 498-503
Open
The effect of activity levels of total hip arthroplasty patients on socket penetration
A. A.J. Goldsmith; D. Dowson; B. M. Wroblewski; P. D. Siney; P. A. Fleming; J. M. Lane
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 620-627
Open
The influence of technique on fixation of primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
H.Clayton Thomason III; Paul F. Lachiewicz
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 628-634
Open
The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties
J. Mahaluxmivala; M. J.K. Bankes; P. Nicolai; C. H. Aldam; P. W. Allen
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 635-640
Open
Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty
J. Novotny; M. H. Gonzalez; F. M.L. Amirouche; Y. C. Li
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 641-647
Open
Dependency of cement mantle thickness on femoral stem design and centralizer
Steffen J. Breusch; Martin Lukoschek; Jürgen Kreutzer; Dario Brocai; Thomas A. Gruen
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 648-657
Open
A new pin-on-disk wear testing method for simulating wear of polyethylene on cobalt-chrome alloy in total hip arthroplasty
Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel O. O'Connor; Jay D. Lowenstein; Murali Jasty; Stephen A. Biggs; William H. Harris
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 658-665
Open
Acetabular revision with impacted freeze-dried cancellous bone chips and a cemented cup: A report of 7 cases at 5 to 9 years’ follow-up
Truike M. Thien; Marianne L.M. Welten; Nico Verdonschot; Pieter Buma; Pu Yong; B. Willem Schreurs
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 666-670
Open
Superior mesenteric vein tear with total hip arthroplasty
Jonathan N. Grauer; John M. Keggi; Kristaps J. Keggi
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 671-673
Open
Wear debris from total hip arthroplasty presenting as an intrapelvic mass
Kan Hing Mak; Tsz Kau Wong; Nises Chandra Poddar
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 674-676
Open
The effect of pulsed irrigation on the incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty
R. J.S. Sneath; F. D. Bindi; J. Davies; E. J. Parnell
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 547-551
Open
Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: A prospective randomized trial
Michael Tanzer; Stephen Kantor; Leonard Rosenthall; J. Dennis Bobyn
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 552-558
Open
Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series
Henrik M. Schrøder; Anne Berthelsen; Galal Hassani; Else B. Hansen; Søren Solgaard
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 559-567
Open
Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage
Carsten Perka; Ralph Ludwig
2001
Citation Data
Open
The Harris hip score: Comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment
Nizar N. Mahomed; David C. Arndt; Brian J. McGrory; William H. Harris
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 575-580
Open
Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
William D. Bugbee; Deborah J. Ammeen; Gerard A. Engh
2001
Abstract: We reviewed 139 consecutive femoral or tibial revision knee arthroplasties to determine if the outcome of revision knee arthroplasty using revision implant systems was superior to revisions using primary implant systems. Group 1 (n = 42) consisted of revisions performed with implants designed for primary total knee arthroplasty. Group 2 (n = 42) consisted of revisions performed with modified primary components. Group 3 (n = 55) consisted of revisions performed with components specifically designed for revision arthroplasty. The implant status was known in 123 of 139 knees at a mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-12 years). The implant-related failure rate, defined as reoperation requiring component revision or removal, was 26% for group 1, 14% for group 2, and 6% for group 3 (P<.05). Revision implants exhibited superior performance and durability despite their use in more difficult reconstructions. The improved longevity of revision implants justifies the evolution of modular revision components.
Open
The Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty: A minimum 8-year follow-up study
Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 586-597
Open
Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems
Alfaro-Adrián, J.; Gill, H.S.; Murray, D.W.
2001
The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 598-606
Open