Otsikko Julkaisija Vuosi Info
Comparison between 1-hour and 24-hour drain clamping using diluted epinephrine solution after total knee arthroplasty Kunio Yamada; Tsukasa Imaizumi; Manji Uemura; Naoya Takada; Yoshio Kim 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 458-462 Open
Head penetration into Hylamer acetabular liner sterilized by gamma irradiation in air and in a nitrogen atmosphere Ken-ichi Yamauchi; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Seiki Iwasada; Shinji Sakano; Shinji Kitamura; Hideki Warashina; Hisashi Iwata 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 463-470 Open
Primary total knee arthroplasty for supracondylar/condylar femoral fracture in osteoarthritic knees Nobuyuki Yoshino; Shinro Takai; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Yasushi Ohshima; Yasusuke Hirasawa 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 471-475 Open
Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients Robertsson, Otto; Dunbar, Michael J. 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 476-482 Open
Rehabilitation after total shoulder arthroplasty N.Douglas Boardman III; Robert H. Cofield; Keith A. Bengtson; Richard Little; Maureen C. Jones; Charles M. Rowland 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 483-486 Open
The effect of a tibial baseplate undersurface peripheral lip on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty Christopher J. Vertullo; J. Rod Davey 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 487-492 Open
Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees Nobuyuki Yoshino; Shinro Takai; Yasuo Ohtsuki; Yasusuke Hirasawa 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 493-497 Open
Aspergillus fumigatus infection in a mega prosthetic total knee arthroplasty: Salvage by staged reimplantation with 5-year follow-up Patricia A. Baumann; Benjamin Cunningham; Nishitkumar S. Patel; Henry A. Finn 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 498-503 Open
The effect of activity levels of total hip arthroplasty patients on socket penetration A. A.J. Goldsmith; D. Dowson; B. M. Wroblewski; P. D. Siney; P. A. Fleming; J. M. Lane 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 620-627 Open
The influence of technique on fixation of primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis H.Clayton Thomason III; Paul F. Lachiewicz 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 628-634 Open
The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties J. Mahaluxmivala; M. J.K. Bankes; P. Nicolai; C. H. Aldam; P. W. Allen 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 635-640 Open
Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty J. Novotny; M. H. Gonzalez; F. M.L. Amirouche; Y. C. Li 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 641-647 Open
Dependency of cement mantle thickness on femoral stem design and centralizer Steffen J. Breusch; Martin Lukoschek; Jürgen Kreutzer; Dario Brocai; Thomas A. Gruen 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 648-657 Open
A new pin-on-disk wear testing method for simulating wear of polyethylene on cobalt-chrome alloy in total hip arthroplasty Charles R. Bragdon; Daniel O. O'Connor; Jay D. Lowenstein; Murali Jasty; Stephen A. Biggs; William H. Harris 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 658-665 Open
Acetabular revision with impacted freeze-dried cancellous bone chips and a cemented cup: A report of 7 cases at 5 to 9 years’ follow-up Truike M. Thien; Marianne L.M. Welten; Nico Verdonschot; Pieter Buma; Pu Yong; B. Willem Schreurs 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 666-670 Open
Superior mesenteric vein tear with total hip arthroplasty Jonathan N. Grauer; John M. Keggi; Kristaps J. Keggi 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 671-673 Open
Wear debris from total hip arthroplasty presenting as an intrapelvic mass Kan Hing Mak; Tsz Kau Wong; Nises Chandra Poddar 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 674-676 Open
The effect of pulsed irrigation on the incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty R. J.S. Sneath; F. D. Bindi; J. Davies; E. J. Parnell 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 547-551 Open
Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: A prospective randomized trial Michael Tanzer; Stephen Kantor; Leonard Rosenthall; J. Dennis Bobyn 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 552-558 Open
Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series Henrik M. Schrøder; Anne Berthelsen; Galal Hassani; Else B. Hansen; Søren Solgaard 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 559-567 Open
Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage Carsten Perka; Ralph Ludwig 2001 Citation Data Open
The Harris hip score: Comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment Nizar N. Mahomed; David C. Arndt; Brian J. McGrory; William H. Harris 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 575-580 Open
Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo William D. Bugbee; Deborah J. Ammeen; Gerard A. Engh 2001 Abstract: We reviewed 139 consecutive femoral or tibial revision knee arthroplasties to determine if the outcome of revision knee arthroplasty using revision implant systems was superior to revisions using primary implant systems. Group 1 (n = 42) consisted of revisions performed with implants designed for primary total knee arthroplasty. Group 2 (n = 42) consisted of revisions performed with modified primary components. Group 3 (n = 55) consisted of revisions performed with components specifically designed for revision arthroplasty. The implant status was known in 123 of 139 knees at a mean follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-12 years). The implant-related failure rate, defined as reoperation requiring component revision or removal, was 26% for group 1, 14% for group 2, and 6% for group 3 (P<.05). Revision implants exhibited superior performance and durability despite their use in more difficult reconstructions. The improved longevity of revision implants justifies the evolution of modular revision components. Open
The Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty: A minimum 8-year follow-up study Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 586-597 Open
Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems Alfaro-Adrián, J.; Gill, H.S.; Murray, D.W. 2001 The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: 598-606 Open