ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries
Rory J Ferguson, Alan J Silman, Christophe Combescure, Erik Bulow, Daniel Odin, Didier Hannouche, Siôn Glyn-Jones, Ola Rolfson & Anne Lübbeke
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 324-330
Open
Outcome of 881 total hip arthroplasties in 747 patients 21 years or younger: data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 1995–2016
Vera Halvorsen, Anne Marie Fenstad, Lars B Engesæter, Lars Nordsletten, Søren Overgaard, Alma B Pedersen, Johan Kärrholm, Maziar Mohaddes, Antti Eskelinen, Keijo T Mäkelä & Stephan M Röhrl
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 331-337
Open
Lower 5-year cup re-revision rate for dual mobility cups compared with unipolar cups: report of 15,922 cup revision cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
Esther M Bloemheuvel, Liza N van Steenbergen & Bart A Swierstra
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 338-341
Open
Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasingly uniform patient demographics despite differences in surgical volume and usage—a descriptive study of 8,501 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry
Cecilie Henkel, Mette Mikkelsen, Alma B Pedersen, Lasse E Rasmussen, Kirill Gromov, Andrew Price & Anders Troelsen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 354-359
Open
Patient-reported 1-year outcome not affected by body mass index in 3,327 total knee arthroplasty patients
Anders Overgaard, Lars Lidgren, Martin Sundberg, Otto Robertsson & Annette W-Dahl
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 360-365
Open
Marker-based versus model-based radiostereometric analysis of total knee arthroplasty migration: a reanalysis with comparable mean outcomes despite distinct types of measurement error
Koen T van Hamersveld, Perla J Marang–van de Mheen, Lennard A Koster, Rob G H H Nelissen, Sören Toksvig-Larsen & Bart L Kaptein
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 366-372
Open
Inadequate evaluation and management of suspected infections after TKA surgery in Lithuania: a retrospective study of 2,769 patients with 2-year follow-up
Egle Terteliene, Kazimieras Grigaitis, Otto Robertsson, Justinas Stucinskas, Sarunas Tarasevicius, Narunas Porvaneckas & Algirdas Venalis
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 373-376
Open
The development of an online implant manufacturer application: a knowledge-sharing platform for the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Johanna Vinblad, Daniel Odin, Johan Kärrholm & Ola Rolfson
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:4, 406-409
Open
Recurrent arthrocele and sterile sinus tract formation due to ceramic wear as a differential diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection — a case report
Nico Maximilian Jandl, Tim Rolvien, Daniel Gätjen, Anika Jonitz-Heincke, Armin Springer, Veit Krenn, Rainer Bader & Wolfgang Rüther
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 501-504
Open
Contemporary posterior surgical approach in total hip replacement: still more reoperations due to dislocation compared with direct lateral approach? An observational study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 156,979 hips
Oscar Skoogh, Georgios Tsikandylakis, Maziar Mohaddes, Szilard Nemes, Daniel Odin, Peter Grant & Ola Rolfson
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 411-416
Open
Registry study on failure incidence in 1,127 revised hip implants with stem trunnion re-use after 10 years of follow-up: limited influence of an adapter sleeve
Saverio Affatato, Monica Cosentino, Francesco Castagnini & Barbara Bordini
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 417-420
Open
Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Yosef Tyson, Ola Rolfson, Johan Kärrholm, Nils P Hailer & Maziar Mohaddes
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 421-426
Open
Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years
Jabbar Mohammed, Sebastian Mukka, Carl-Johan Hedbeck, Ghazi Chammout, Max Gordon & Olof Sköldenberg
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 427-432
Open
No effect of delivery on total hip replacement survival: a nationwide register study in Finland
Ilari Kuitunen, Eerik T Skyttä, Miia Artama, Heini Huhtala & Antti Eskelinen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 433-438
Open
Low complication rate after same-day total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective, single-center cohort study in 116 procedures
Merete N Madsen, Maria L Kirkegaard, Malene Laursen, Jens R Larsen, Merete F Pedersen, Birgitte Skovgaard, Thomas PrynØ & Lone R Mikkelsen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 439-444
Open
Cementing of the hip arthroplasty stem increases load-to-failure force: a cadaveric study
Antonio Klasan, Martin Bäumlein, Christopher Bliemel, Sven Edward Putnis, Thomas Neri, Markus Dietmar Schofer & Thomas Jan Heyse
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 445-449
Open
Sequence of 305,996 total hip and knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing operations on more than 1 joint
Peter Espinosa, Rüdiger J Weiss, Otto Robertsson & Johan Kärrholm
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 450-454
Open
Optimization of the empirical antibiotic choice during the treatment of acute prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective analysis of 91 patients
Joost H J Van Erp, Adriaan C Heineken, Remco J A Van Wensen, Robin W T M Van Kempen, Johannes G E Hendriks, Marjolijn Wegdam-Blans, Judith M Fonville & M C (Marieke) Van Der Steen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 455-459
Open
Uncemented monoblock trabecular metal posterior stabilized high-flex total knee arthroplasty: similar pattern of migration to the cruciate-retaining design — a prospective radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical evaluation of 40 patients (49 knees) 60 years or younger with 9 years’ follow-up
Radoslaw Wojtowicz, Anders Henricson, Kjell G Nilsson & Sead Crnalic
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 460-466
Open
Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994–2017
Mona Badawy, Anne Marie Fenstad & Ove Furnes
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 467-472
Open
Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty—registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review
Nikolaj B Bendixen, Peter W Eskelund & Anders Odgaard
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 473-478
Open
Bone remodeling of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: secondary endpoints analyzed from a randomized trial comparing monoblock and modular tibia trays—2 year follow-up of 53 cases
Mikkel Rathsach Andersen, Nikolaj Winther, Thomas Lind, Henrik M Schrøder & Michael Mørk Petersen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 479-483
Open
Manipulation under anesthesia after primary knee arthroplasty in Sweden: incidence, patient characteristics and risk of revision
Hunbogi Thorsteinsson, Margareta Hedström, Otto Robertsson, Natalie Lundin & Annette W-Dahl
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 484-488
Open
Increased use of total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and improved patient-reported outcome in Denmark, 2006–2015: a nationwide cohort study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry
Jeppe V Rasmussen, Alexander Amundsen, Anne Kathrine B Sørensen, Tobias W Klausen, John Jakobsen, Steen L Jensen & Bo S Olsen
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:5, 489-494
Open
Use and outcome of 1,220 primary total elbow arthroplasties from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Replacement Registry 2008–2018
Background and purpose — The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) was analyzed to determine trends in use of primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), the types of prostheses used, primary diagnoses, reasons for and types of revision, and whether the primary diagnosis or prosthesis design influenced the revision rate. Patients and methods — During 2008–2018, 1,220 primary TEA procedures were reported of which 140 TEAs were revised. Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship were used to describe the time to first revision and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to compare revision rates. Results — The annual number of TEAs performed remained constant. The 3 most common diagnoses for primary TEA were fracture/dislocation (trauma) (36%), osteoarthritis (OA) (34%), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (26%). The cumulative percentage revision for all TEAs undertaken for any reason was 10%, 15%, and 19% at 3, 6, and 9 years. TEAs undertaken for OA had a higher revision rate compared with TEAs for trauma (HR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.0) and RA (HR = 2.0, CI 1.3–3.1). The Coonrad-Morrey (50%), Latitude (30%), Nexel (10%), and Discovery (9%) were the most used prosthesis designs. There was no difference in revision rates when these 4 designs were compared. The most common reasons for revision were infection (35%) and aseptic loosening (34%). Interpretation — The indications for primary and revision TEA in Australia are similar to those reported for other registries. Revision for trauma is lower than previously reported.
2019
Acta Orthopaedica, 90:6, 511-516
Open
