Morphologic features of the hips, in particular those features germane to determination of acetabular and femoral anteversion angles and femoral head offset, were studied in 50 male and 50 female human skeletons with bilateral normal joints. Four distinct configurations were identified relative to the anterior acetabular ridge. The majority (121, 60.5%) were curved; 51 (25.5%) were angular; 19 (9.5%) were irregular; and nine (4.5%) were straight. The acetabular anteversion angle measured 19.9° ± 6.6° (range, 7°–42°) and was significantly larger in females (21.3° ± 7.1°) versus males (18.5° ± 5.8°). The notch acetabular angle, which can be identified easily intraoperatively, was defined as the angle created at the intersection of a line from the sciatic notch along the posterior acetabular ridge and a line from the posterior to the anterior acetabular wall. This angle is almost perpendicular (89.0° ± 3.5°) and, therefore, may provide an accurate estimate of acetabular anteversion during cup placement. Awareness of the anatomic differences between genders for acetabular anteversion angle, anterolateral bowing of the femur, and neck shaft angle may help reduce the relatively higher incidence of dislocation in females and may lead to different implant designs for male and female patients.

Cemented fixation of the femoral stem is the gold standard for patients older than 60 years. The importance of reliably achieving an adequate cement mantle has been shown in many studies. Currently, inspection and grading of plain radiographs is the accepted method for study of the cement mantle. However, the reliability of plain radiographs for this purpose has been questioned. In addition, the interobserver agreement of current grading systems has been shown to be limited. A new in vitro method of cement mantle analysis is described. Plastic replicas of six contemporary stems were implanted into femurs from cadavers. The specimens were imaged with a computed tomography scanner. Detailed, computer-assisted analysis of mantle thickness was done. Comparisons were made between designs. A subset was compared with standard radiographs. Plain radiographs overestimated thickness and underestimated the deficiencies. There was significant variability in the mantle produced by the different designs. Commonly used designs had deficiencies in their mantles by standard criteria despite proper surgical technique. The importance of being fully acquainted with the particular implant one uses is emphasized by these results. This is a valuable technique for investigation of the effects on the cement mantle of implant design, surgical technique, and patient anatomy.