Management of periprosthetic fracture following total knee arthroplasty- a retrospective study to decide when to fix or when to revise?
Nikhil Verma,∗ Anuj Jain, Chander Pal, Simon Thomas, Shekhar Agarwal, and Prateek GargKnee
Purpose
Periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty are relatively rare complication comprises to 0.3–2.5%. But these injuries are often complex and challenging for the surgeons due to ageing population in conjunction with severe osteoporosis. The management option varies from conservative to internal fixation or revision surgery. Thus this study was conducted to analyze the results of various methods of treatment of periprosthetic fractures following TKA and to form the optimal treatment guidelines for fixation or revision.
Material and methods
51 cases diagnosed with periprosthetic fracture were enrolled and underwent surgical intervention. Type of primary prosthesis, interval between TKA and periprosthetic fracture, type of fracture, prosthesis stability and mode of fixation of fracture, any revision surgery and complication were noted.
Results
The mean age of all patients was 65.89 years. The mean interval between the index surgery and periprosthetic fracture was 6 years (Range 2 months to 10 years) in male and 18.5 months (Range 4 days to 7 years) in female. 44 (86%) fractures were femoral, 4 (8%) fractures were tibial and 3 (6%) fractures were of patella. The mean knee society score (KSS) & oxford knee score (OKS) were found to be good for revision group as compared to the fixation group at final follow up.
Conclusion
In presence of poor bone stock, far distal fracture configuration, comminution, severe osteoporosis, difficulty in achieving stability with plates & old age-revision TKA is a viable option with stemmed components.
Link to article