Background
This study aims to evaluate outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with preoperative genu recurvatum.
This study aims to evaluate outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with preoperative genu recurvatum.
From patients who underwent UKA at a tertiary hospital between 2005 and 2012, the study selected 30 patients with genu recurvatum (group A) compared with a matching cohort of 60 without genu recurvatum (group B). Group A was also compared with a matched cohort of 60 patients with genu recurvatum who underwent total knee arthroplasty (group C). Functional outcomes data were prospectively collected at 6-month and 2-year follow-up.
Two years after UKA, group A had poorer Oxford Knee Score of 22 ± 8 compared with group B at 16 ± 3 (P < .001), and the trend is reflected in the Knee Society Score (71 ± 17 vs 87 ± 17, P < .001) and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (47 ± 10 vs 52 ± 6, P = .014). After 2 years, group C had superior Oxford Knee Score (16 ± 2, P < .001), Knee Society Score (82 ± 14, P = .003), and 36 Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (53 ± 6, P = .005). The hyperextension angle in group A decreased from 6° ± 2° to 2° ± 4° after 2 years with an improvement of 4° ± 4° (P < .001). The hyperextension angle in group C decreased from 7° ± 2° to 1° ± 3° after 2 years with an improvement of 6° ± 3° (P < .001) with a significant difference (P = .002) in hyperextension angle correction between group A and C.
Preoperative recurvatum is a predictor of poorer outcome after UKA, and this patient population benefits from better 2-year functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.