The Lancet Rheumatology, ISSN: 2665-9913, Vol: 3, Issue: 6, Page: e406-e407

Denosumab after total hip arthroplasty – Authors’ reply

Mohit M. Mahatma; Raveen L. Jayasuriya; Richard Eastell; Jeremy M. Wilkinson; Nigel Hoggard; David Hughes; Simon C. Buckley; Andrew Gordon; Andrew J. Hamer; Mohammed W. Tomouk; Robert M. Kerry
Hip
We thank Vivek Tiwari and Purnima Tiwari for their interest in our Article,

and for their assessment of the value of our findings for the development of a non-surgical treatment for osteolysis after joint replacement. As arthroplasty surgeons, we are highly sensitive to the issue of periprosthetic infection risk that represents a disastrous patient outcome after joint replacement. However, in the meta-analysis of all clinical trials of denosumab (60 mg dose, 33 studies [including the FREEDOM trial referred to by the correspondents], 22 253 patients) by Diker-Cohen and colleagues,

there was no reported difference in the relative risk of any infection (denosumab vs placebo 1·03, 95% CI 0·99–1·06) nor infection-related mortality (0·55, 0·20–1·23) between treatment groups. As such, we find this reassuringly in support of the safety of denosumab for use in the setting of osteolysis.


Link to article