Clinical Outcomes, Survivorship and Adverse Events With Mobile-Bearings Versus Fixed-Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty—A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study of 143 ADM Versus 130 Trident Cups at 2 to 6-Year Follow-Up

The principle of dual mobility cups, often called “tripolar”, has been developed to overcome the problem of instability following primary hip arthroplasty. We prospectively compared two cohorts which differed only by the type of bearings, i.e.” mobile bearing hip” (MBH) in a 143-study cohort of ADM cups versus “fixed bearing hip” (FBH) of 130 Trident PSL cups, at a follow-up at 2–6 years. The survival rates at 4.13-years, with instability as endpoint was significantly (P = 0.0176) in favor of mobile bearings at 100% with no dislocation reported, versus 94.8% with fixed bearings. These mobile bearings, matching both “modern” dual mobility cups and annealed highly crossed polyethylene, would appear to offer at longer follow-up a valuable solution to clinical outcomes in acetabular arthroplasty.